Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's score of 75.6. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat, so it provides the user lots of additional features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, although it's extremely heavier and notably thicker.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 4 more processing cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better screen than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z Droid Edition features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Moto Z Droid Edition has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.