Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 global score. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, although it is incredibly thicker and notably heavier.
The Moto Z Droid Edition features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera in the back with a way higher 25 megapixels resolution.
The Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 56% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.