Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a overall score of 92.3 against 75.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is noticeably newer than Moto Z Droid Edition, it is a lot thicker and much heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Droid Edition has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, although it has a less mega pixels camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.