Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a general score of 94.6 against 75.6. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, it's thicker and much heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.