Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-07-28 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s is slightly better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a general score of 83 against 76.4. The Apple iPhone 6s body has the same thickness than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it is lighter. The iPhone 6s counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 6s has a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a much lower resolution of 1334 x 750px, a little bit smaller screen and a lot lower pixel count per screen inch. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much longer battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has a 104 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.