Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-07-28 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s Plus is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a global score of 84.2 against 76.4. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, iPhone 6s Plus's construction is older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The iPhone 6s Plus counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has improved battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.