Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-07-28 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 76.4. IPhone X is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's a little heavier and a little bit thicker. IPhone X features a better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a larger number of cores.
IPhone X has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size aperture. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.