Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. The Apple iPhone XR construction is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. IPhone XR features a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and more CPU cores.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh. IPhone XR captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a lower video definition and a much less MP resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.