Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The iPhone XS design is way newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it's just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Apple iPhone XS counts with a superior CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also has a 64 bits CPU and a higher number of cores.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. IPhone XS counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.