Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2016-07-28 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a 76.4 score against 76.2. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, even when they were released with only 7 months difference. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has a greater number of cores (but slower). The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has 128 GB internal memory.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.