Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having an 80.7 score against 76.4. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is extremely newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 21 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition and the Google Pixel 3 XL both count with very similar battery durations, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has 3430mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.