Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 78.9 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a higher number of cores (but slower). Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. Moto Z Force Droid Edition takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.