Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is notably newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a slightly better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bigger display. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.