Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a score of 82.7 against 76.4. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen pixels density. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot lower resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.