Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a global score of 82.5 against 76.4. The LG V30S ThinQ design is newer and a little lighter, but a little thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a just a little better pixels count in each inch of display and a little bit bigger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more RAM and more cores.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.