Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer and just a little lighter than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it is also a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bit higher screen density and a little bit bigger display.
LG V35 ThinQ's memory capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to Moto Z Force Droid Edition's one, they have a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and the same internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ and Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lot worse 16 mega pixels resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.