Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a general score of 87.1 against 76.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and less RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot worse display density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, better video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.