Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is notably newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola razr (2020) takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.