Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. The Galaxy A25 5G design is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 less cpu cores (but faster).
Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a much worse pixels amount per inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bigger display. The Galaxy A25 5G has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a way better resolution camera. The Galaxy A25 5G has a superior battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.