Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A31's body is newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's heavier and thicker. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of display.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A31 also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A31 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.