Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 overall score. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only construction is incredibly newer and lighter than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's also thicker. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little lower display density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.