Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a global score of 79.4 against 76.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a lot newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy A35 5G captures better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.