Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a 79.6 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy A40 is just a little thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's lighter and also noticeably newer. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a way higher video quality.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.