Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a score of 83.8 against 76.4. The Galaxy A50 construction is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is just a bit heavier and a little thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50 features just a little better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.