Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A51's design is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it is a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy A51 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A51 also has a greater number of cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher count of pixels per inch of display. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features just a bit better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.