Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a score of 90.8 against 76.4. Galaxy A51 5G is a much newer device than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of 2200 megahertz cores.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G features slightly more memory to install applications and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G counts with better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.