Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-07-28 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 90.7 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A52 design is notably newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A52 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features longer battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.