Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 global score. The Galaxy A70 is a newer phone than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy A70 features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.