Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with an 85.2 score against 76.4. Galaxy F41 is a notably newer cellphone than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Galaxy F41 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F41 also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.