Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 97.6 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is way newer and just a little bit thinner than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features improved battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. The Galaxy Fold shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.