Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a overall score of 85 against 76.4. Even though the Galaxy M40 is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better display pixel density. The Galaxy M40 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M40 also has a larger camera aperture and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M40, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M40 has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.