Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. Galaxy M51's construction is a lot newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cores and more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy M51 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.