Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a general score of 89 against 76.4. The Galaxy Note10 body is notably newer, but a little thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note10 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note10 features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.