Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger screen. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video definition and a camera in the back with a way better resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.