Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a score of 90.7 against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a much better video resolution, a camera with way more MP and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.