Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Plus is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a global score of 78.1 against 76.4. Despite of the fact Galaxy S5 Plus is extremely older and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit better display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a little worse pixels density and a quite smaller screen.
Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with improved battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.