Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and Red |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's general score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a notably older and thicker phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a just a bit lower pixel density and a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a way better 21 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.