Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is notably heavier and much thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.