Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design has the same thickness than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.