Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 79.3 score against 76.4. The Xiaomi Poco X2 body is notably newer, but much heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.