Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's general score of 76.4. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC construction is newer, but noticeably thicker and a lot heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.