Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having an 81.1 score against 76.4. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's heavier and thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.