Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it's heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.