Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting an 83.3 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 11 body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Force. The Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a much better pixels density. The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 has a quite better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 also has a 64-bit CPU and a greater number of cores. The iPhone 11 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, although it has a back camera with much less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3110mAh.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 11, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.