Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than Moto Z Force, having a overall score of 85.3 against 75.8. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a extremely newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display. The Moto Z Force features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a 64 bits processor and a greater number of cores. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, they both have the same aperture.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.