Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 is much better than Moto Z Force, with a score of 88.7 against 75.8. Apple iPhone 12's construction is extremely newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Moto Z Force. Apple iPhone 12 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Moto Z Force has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 12 features a greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 12 also has a greater number of faster cores and a 64 bits processor. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with better battery lifetime than iPhone 12, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity.
The iPhone 12 features a camera that's just as good as Motorola Moto Z Force's camera, because although the iPhone 12 has a lower video resolution and a much less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 12, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.