Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is way better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a 93.2 score against 75.8. The iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1284 x 2778 and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen. The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores , a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a camera that's just as good as Motorola Moto Z Force's camera, because although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a lower video definition and a back facing camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 12 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.