Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 is a lot better than Moto Z Force, getting a 91.5 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 13 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it's a little heavier and just a little thicker.
The iPhone 13 counts with a greater processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 also has a 64-bit CPU and a larger number of cores. IPhone 13 has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532px, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little better battery duration than iPhone 13, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
IPhone 13's camera is just as good as the Moto Z Force one, because although the iPhone 13 has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 13, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.