Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. IPhone 13 Pro's construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM, a larger number of cores and a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 13 Pro has a camera that's just as good as the Moto Z Force one, because although the iPhone 13 Pro has a lot less megapixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Moto Z Force counts with a little better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.