Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Moto Z Force, with a score of 95.6 against 75.8. Even though the iPhone 14 Pro is newer than Moto Z Force, it is just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x OS, while Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory, more processing cores and a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a brighter display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1179 x 2556, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better storage for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit better battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The iPhone 14 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
IPhone 14 Pro is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.